NOTES |
Really advanced technology here [snigger]. No dual A.C./D.C. mains either,
the heaters for the not-often-found-in-tellies 'E' range of Mullard valves
having their own heater transformer whilst the H.T. - always a struggle
to get enough volts here and hence would really benefit from a mains transformer
- is directly rectified from the mains.
You won't find any poncy energy recovery diodes either, something that
had become pretty much standard design by other manufacturers during the
previous decade. Perhaps that was because Mullard never thought someone
would be dumb enough to use the 'E' range in a telly and therefore only
produced 'P' versions of boost diodes. Without the energy recovery diode,
I'm impressed it managed to get enough power to scan the C.R.T. - pehaps
the total lack of any line linearity control that might have sapped a
bit of power helped.
![Cor, just look at all that screening (!) [26K]](lorralorrascreening.jpg) |
By now, most sets were superhet designs, but good old Ferranti stuck to
the T.R.F. design (only to release a modified superhet version, the T1505S,
the following year). Screening between sections of a T.R.F. receiver is
even more important than with a superhet design so it is good to see Ferranti
putting so much effort into such screening ... errr... riiiiight ...
![Ornate tuning scale [11K]](ornatetuningscale.jpg) |
One of their top of the range sets this, having as it does a built
in radio complete with highly ornate no-expense-spared designer tuning
scale. No attempt for any commonality between the TV and radio sections,
the radio is a completely seperate unit right down to having its own
weenie little speaker (well, you wouldn't want to wear out the thumping
great speaker used by the telly now would you). Having said that,
by keeping the telly and radio units completely and utterly seperate,
you could at least listen to the radio whilst the telly was bust.
|
![Patented drift compensation [27K]](contwols.jpg) |
And what to do if you can't design a stable circuit ? Simple, make
everything easilly accessible from the front of the set. The amount
of wear around the width and horizontal hold controls prove how wise
a design idea this was and must have been a blessing for the set's
original owner !
Still not stable enough ? Well, time to mention that in the perhaps
12 months before the replacement model was introduced, Ferranti tried
no less than three different frame timebase circuits. However, in
each instance the same frame sync circuit was used; amazingly, a feed
was take from the last but one I.F. stage, fed to it's own personal
I.F. stage that was demodulated and fed to the frame timebase. |
I bet the service engineer also worshiped the ground the set stood
on, with such well thought out positioning of serviceable items such
as main fuses.
Incidently, the service manual shows the metal rectifier mounted directly
below the scan coils but it seems in this version some bright spark
finally saw the light and thought "hey, wouldn't all that heating
of the coils make warm-up drift even worse ? Lets move it somewhere
sensible just like almost every other manufacturer in the freakin'
world". |
![Easy access for servicing [17K]](easyaccess.jpg) |
Well, having almost assasinated the set, time to come clean. I've no idea
whether they were really aweful or really excellent sets. Not that it matters
- its a lovely and unusual set, you don't see many Ferranti's about from
this period (though can't help feeling I know the reason why). Also, like
GEC, Ferranti seemed to have used C.R.T.s with a particularly flat front
face, though to be honest I'd rather have a slighly bulbous C.R.T. face
if it meant I also got an ion trap magnet to protect the C.R.T.! |